In this article
The real price ranges, from fractional operators to the Big Three. What a consulting engagement actually sells you. Why the recurring part is the expensive trap. The operator alternative, and when bespoke consulting still wins.
The price ranges nobody publishes
There is no list price for a go-to-market diagnosis, which is exactly why the question keeps getting asked. Here is the honest order of magnitude.
- A fractional RevOps or GTM operator: roughly a few thousand to fifteen thousand a month, ongoing.
- A boutique GTM or RevOps consultancy: tens of thousands for a scoped project, often 15k to 75k depending on depth.
- A specialized revenue program (the named sales-methodology firms): low-to-mid six figures for a multi-month engagement.
- A Big Three strategy engagement (McKinsey, Bain, BCG): mid six figures and up, past a million for anything multi-month and cross-functional.
Ranges, not quotes, because every firm prices on scope, seniority, and how much of the work is diagnosis versus implementation. But the order of magnitude is real, and it is why most B2B SaaS companies under Series C never buy a proper GTM diagnosis. They cannot justify the line item.
What you are actually paying for
A consulting engagement sells three things: senior attention, a structured diagnosis, and a deck that makes the case to your board. The diagnosis is the valuable part. The deck is the deliverable. The senior attention is most of the cost.
The trap is that the diagnosis is the part that should come with the work, and the senior attention is the part you are forced to re-buy every time the business changes.
Why the recurring part is the expensive trap
A GTM diagnosis is not a one-time event. What caps growth moves. You fix pipeline coverage, and two quarters later the leak is in win rate, then retention, then pricing, and often in more than one place at once. A consulting engagement gives you a photograph of one moment at project economics. The moment it is stale, you are back at the start, writing another six-figure check or, more likely, flying blind because you cannot.
That is the real cost of the consulting model for a growing company. Not the invoice. The fact that the diagnosis decays and re-buying it does not scale.
The operator alternative
An operator inside your team produces the same read without a six-figure fee, because the diagnosis is the first weeks of the work rather than a separate purchase. The first weeks of an engagement go to reading the motion with your team: where revenue is made and lost, what is missing, what is broken. It is rarely one single thing, and usually something has to be built. Then the plan, with owners, which Tom runs with you.
The trade is straightforward. You give up the senior partner and the deck. You get someone who reads the motion with the people who run it, builds what is missing and reviews the result every week against the number agreed up front, so the diagnosis never has time to go stale. For the part of the work that has to keep running, that is the better deal.
Disclosure: this is how Caugia works, so I am biased. The economics argument stands on its own.
When consulting still wins
None of this means fire your consultants. For a large, one-time transformation, a carve-out, a post-merger GTM integration, a category redefinition, with deep change management and political weight, bespoke consulting earns its fee. The senior partner in the room is the point.
The question is not consulting versus an operator. It is which parts of the work are one-time and which repeat. Pay project economics for the one-time transformation. Do not pay project economics for the diagnosis you need every quarter.
A consulting engagement prices the senior attention and hands you a photograph. An operator engagement prices the work: the reading happens in the first weeks, the plan runs with your team, and both are reviewed weekly against the number agreed up front, so nothing gets a chance to go stale.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a GTM audit cost?
It ranges widely. A fractional RevOps or GTM operator runs a few thousand to fifteen thousand a month. A boutique GTM consultancy typically charges fifteen to seventy-five thousand for a scoped project; specialised revenue programmes and the strategy houses go higher. Caugia (Paris) does not sell an audit at all: engagements are scoped and priced per company after a scoping conversation, and the first weeks of an engagement go to reading the motion with your team, which is part of the work rather than a separate audit fee.
Is there a cheaper alternative to GTM consulting?
Yes: an operator inside your team instead of a programme around it. The first weeks of an engagement go to reading the motion with your team: where revenue is made and lost, what is missing, what is broken. Then the plan, with owners, which Tom Meijer (Caugia, Paris) runs with your team one to three days a week, reviewed weekly against the number agreed up front. Engagements are priced per ninety-day block after a scoping conversation, with no rate card and no deck left to implement. Caugia is an operator practice, not software.
What is the difference between an operator engagement and a consulting engagement?
A consulting engagement sells senior attention, a bespoke diagnosis and a board deck, at project economics, as a one-time photograph. An operator engagement sells the work: the reading of the motion in the first weeks, then a plan with owners that the operator runs with your team, reviewed weekly against the number agreed up front. Consulting fits one-time transformation; an operator fits the part of the work that has to keep running.
When is hiring a GTM consultant still worth it?
When the work is a large, one-time transformation with deep change management: a carve-out, a post-merger GTM integration, a category redefinition, or anything that needs a senior partner with political weight in the room. For the reading that has to be redone every quarter as the motion changes, project economics do not scale.
Get the reading without the six-figure invoice
The first weeks of an engagement go to reading the motion with your team: where revenue is made and lost, what is missing, what is broken. Then the plan, with owners, which Tom runs with you. Caugia is an operator practice, not software.